van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Viechtbauer, W.
(2018).
Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods.
doi: https://osf.io/kcaqb/.
Klein, R. A., …, van Aert, R. C. M., …, Nosek, B. A.
(2018).
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological.
doi: https://osf.io/8cd4r/.
Augusteijn, H. E. M., van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2018).
The effect of publication bias on the assessment of heterogeneity. Psychological Methods.
doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gv25c.
van Aert, R. C. M., Jackson, D.
(2018).
Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator. Statistics in Medicine, 37(17), 2616-2629.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7665.
van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2018).
Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1515-1539.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0967-6.
van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2017).
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study. PloS ONE, 12(4): e0175302.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175302.
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2016).
Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1832).
doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832.
van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2016).
Conducting meta-Analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650874.
Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M.
(2016).
Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: What is going on?. PeerJ, 4:e1935.
doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1935.
Anderson, C. J., …, van Aert, R. C. M., …, Zuni, K.
(2016).
Response to comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science, 351(6277).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163.
van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M.
(2015).
Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only significant studies. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 293-309.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000025.
Open Science Collaboration
(2015).
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
van der Ark, L. A., van Aert, R. C. M.
(2014).
Comparing confidence intervals for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma coefficient. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(12), 2491-2505.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2014.932791.
Nuijten, M. B., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M.
(2014).
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(7), 712-713.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322149111.
van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M.
(2014).
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results. PloS ONE, 9(1): e84896.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084896.