Publications

2018

van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Viechtbauer, W. (2018). Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. doi: https://osf.io/kcaqb/.

Details OSF

Klein, R. A., …, van Aert, R. C. M., …, Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological, 1(4), 443-490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225.

Details Journal Website

Augusteijn, H. E. M., van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018). The effect of publication bias on the assessment of heterogeneity. Psychological Methods. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gv25c.

Details PDF OSF

van Aert, R. C. M. (2018). Meta-analysis: Shortcomings and potential. Doctoral dissertation. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EQHJD.

Details PDF

van Aert, R. C. M., Jackson, D. (2018). Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator. Statistics in Medicine, 37(17), 2616-2629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7665.

Details PDF Journal Website OSF

van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018). Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1515-1539. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0967-6.

Details PDF Journal Website OSF

2017

van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study. PloS ONE, 12(4): e0175302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175302.

Details PDF Journal Website OSF

2016

Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1832). doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832.

Details PDF Journal Website

van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Conducting meta-Analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve. Perspectives on Psychological Science. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650874.

Details PDF Journal Website Supplemental materials

Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: What is going on?. PeerJ, 4:e1935. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1935.

Details PDF Journal Website

Anderson, C. J., …, van Aert, R. C. M., …, Zuni, K. (2016). Response to comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science, 351(6277). doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163.

Details Journal Website

2015

van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only significant studies. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 293-309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000025.

Details Journal Website

Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.

Details Journal Website

2014

van der Ark, L. A., van Aert, R. C. M. (2014). Comparing confidence intervals for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma coefficient. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(12), 2491-2505. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2014.932791.

Details Journal Website

Nuijten, M. B., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(7), 712-713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322149111.

Details Post-print Journal Website

van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results. PloS ONE, 9(1): e84896. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084896.

Details PDF Journal Website